Abstract:Chinese manufacturing activity grew more than expected in May, a private survey showed on Thursday, contrasting government data from earlier this week that pointed to a sustained decline in China’s biggest growth engines.

Chinese manufacturing activity grew more than expected in May, a private survey showed on Thursday, contrasting government data from earlier this week that pointed to a sustained decline in Chinas biggest growth engines.
The Caixin Manufacturing Purchasing Managers‘ index (PMI) read 50.9 in May, more than expectations for a reading of 50.3, and the prior month’s figure of 49.5.
The reading surpassed expectations of 49.5 in a Reuters poll, a stark contrast to a deeper contraction activity seen in the official PMI released on Wednesday.
China's recovery from its strict COVID curbs has been fragile and uneven, with economic indicators for April showing imports, factory gate prices and property investment all falling.
“We need more time to see whether the improvement would be sustained, but it is a piece of good news for the Chinese economy,” Zhou Hao, economist at Guotai Junan International, said in a note.
“Further policy support is still required to boost domestic demand, we reckon a 10 bps MLF rate cut in June,” he added.
The manufacturing subindexes showed factory output rose at the fastest clip in 11 months while new orders including new exports expanded in May.
Chinese stocks rose after the better-than-expected PMI data, with the mainland's benchmark CSI 300 and Hong Kong's Hang Seng up roughly 0.6% each.
However, business confidence for the coming 12 months fell to a seven-month low amid concerns over global economic prospects.
Still, analysts at Caixin Insights noted that a broader economic recovery in China remained sluggish, and was still vulnerable to slowing demand and a weak job market.
“Current economic growth lacks internal drive and that market entities lack sufficient confidence, highlighting the importance of expanding and restoring demand… stabilizing employment, increasing income and bolstering expectations through proactive fiscal policy should be prioritized given a dire job market and mounting deflationary pressure,” Wang Zhe, Senior Economist at Caixin Insight Group said in a note.
Zhe also noted that employment in the manufacturing sector remained sluggish, while producers were growing less optimistic about a recovery this year.
While the Chinese government has rolled out a slew of liquidity and stimulus measures to support economic growth, private investment has remained laggard as investors grew uncertain over an economic recovery in the country this year.


People searching NXG MARKETS regulation or regulation NXG MARKETS need to separate an overseas licence from permission in India. The Reserve Bank of India Alert List, updated 19 November 2025, names NXG Markets and nxgmarkets.com. RBI says listed entities are neither authorised to deal in forex under FEMA nor authorised to run an approved forex electronic trading platform. The broker's own site also says it does not serve residents or citizens of India. This NXG MARKETS review found an overseas Mwali licence record, but no RBI authorisation. No cited court ruling proves fraud. For an Indian user, the local warning and service restriction should control the decision.

Neomarkets, a Kazakhstan-based brokerage firm, is facing some allegations of fund scams and unfair charges. These charges were reportedly on both deposits and withdrawals. As negative Neomarkets reviews became prominent on broker evaluation platforms, it was important to inspect these allegations and understand its regulatory scope. We have covered these in this article.

OnFin, a Comoros-based multi-asset brokerage firm, impresses users with its wide range of products and trading platforms. However, user reviews largely reflect negative sentiments for the broker. Withdrawal issues have allegedly become the talking point among users on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. Among the complaints, one user even highlighted a fund scam totaling over $45,000. Additionally, the alleged failure of the broker in providing trade logs added to negative OnFin reviews. While examining the reviews, we have provided a regulatory overview of the broker.

The UK regulator classified the website as a clone of an authorised firm on 28 August 2026. The FCA says the genuine Reclaim Experts Ltd has no connection with the clone.