Abstract:On Wednesday House Speaker Kevin McCarthy planned to send Republican negotiators to the White House to finish out debt limit talks, but warned that the two sides are “still far apart” as they try to reach a budget deal with President Joe Biden. This causes US equities traded lower yesterday because the negotiations over the debt ceiling continued to create uncertainty.

On Wednesday House Speaker Kevin McCarthy planned to send Republican negotiators to the White House to finish out debt limit talks, but warned that the two sides are “still far apart” as they try to reach a budget deal with President Joe Biden. This causes US equities traded lower yesterday because the negotiations over the debt ceiling continued to create uncertainty.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has issued a warning, cautioning that a potential default could occur as early as June 1. This impending deadline adds to the mounting pressure and anxiety surrounding the debt ceiling negotiations. Despite ongoing discussions, yesterdays meeting between President Biden and McCarthy ended without a deal.
The debt ceiling impasse in Washington has triggered a safe-haven effect, with investors flocking to the USD. Also, hawkish Fedtalk has further boosted the dollar‘s strength, even in the face of potential default and recession risks. Market participants are now anticipating that interest rates will remain elevated for the time being. The release of the FOMC Minutes in the US session today reveals more about Fed bankers’ thinking.
As earnings season winds down, a remarkable 77% of S&P 500 companies have surpassed consensus expectations. This impressive performance can be attributed to better-than-anticipated revenue growth, economic resilience, and cost-control initiatives implemented by companies across various sectors. The markets, however, focused on the near-term risks. Ten out of eleven S&P 500 sectors ended the day in the red. The only sector to gain was the energy sector (1.09%). Basic materials, technology and telecommunication sectors were the biggest losers shedding 1.55%, 1.48% and 1.24% respectively.
The annual UK April headline inflation (8.7%) declined compared to March (10.1%), but the focus should be on the core annual inflation figure, which increased substantially (+6.8% vs +6.2% y/y expected). Price pressures are still strong in the UK economy. While food price inflation remains high with only a slight decrease, the drop in headline annual inflation is primarily due to base effects following last years surge in energy prices. The core annual inflation rate is currently at its highest level since March 1992.
The NZD took a dive today, dropping 1.3% after the Reserve Bank of New Zealand signalled an end to rate hikes. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) rate hike was in line with expectations. The central bank raised interest rates by 25 basis points and surprised the markets with a dovish overall tone and guidance. This triggered a sell-off of more than 1.3% in NZD.

GBPUSDH80524
GBPUSD
GBPUSD rallied as the CPI numbers showed the price pressures remain in the UK economy. The market tries to break out of the bearish channel and could turn bullish above 1.2446. Above the level, look for a move to 1.2480 and then to 1.2415 on extension. Below 1.2446, the market might move to 1.2380.

NAS
Nasdaq is short-term bearish below 13 760 after yesterdays bearish engulfing candle. Below 13 760 the market probably trades to 13 630 and then possibly to 13 500 on extension. Above 13 760, look for a move to 13 890.

Silver
Silver is bearish below 23.64 and might trade down to 22.70. Above 23.64, look for a move to 24.10. Silver has a fairly high correlation to gold so if the fall in the US 10-yr. yield continues today both precious metals could appreciate.



A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.

When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact

Trust has always been a widely discussed topic in the forex industry. When genuine, rational voices are drowned out, market participants struggle to discern which information is trustworthy amid a sea of complex data. This difficulty in establishing trust has placed industry transparency at the forefront of attention.

Before thinking about ZarVista, you need to understand the complete picture. At first glance, ZarVista (which used to be called Zara FX) presents itself as a modern, feature-packed trading company. It advertises appealing trading terms, different account options, and the powerful MetaTrader 5 platform. However, our detailed research shows a completely different reality. This broker has major warning signs, an extremely low trust rating, and a high-risk business model. This ZarVista review will examine the broker's promises, comparing what it advertises with actual evidence. We will explore the ZarVista Pros and Cons by looking at its rules and regulations, platform features, and most importantly, the large number of user complaints that show a troubling pattern. This investigation is based on careful analysis of information from independent verification websites like WikiFX, giving you an objective and fact-based review to help you make a smart decision and protect your capital.