Abstract:Analysis of the previous World Cups shows that trading volume drops substantially in the country that has a team playing at the time. The average is 55% of trading in a particular country will drop off as traders presumably watch the game.

Analysis of the previous World Cups shows that trading volume drops substantially in the country that has a team playing at the time. The average is 55% of trading in a particular country will drop off as traders presumably watch the game.
This global event celebrates soccer but exerts a noticeable influence on the economic dynamics of the participating countries. Lets take a short walk through history.
2006, 2010, 2014 & 2018 WORLD CUP: market reactions and analysis
The World Cup Effect is a widespread phenomenon that illustrates the influence of this sporting event on market trends. As the market is heavily influenced by emotions or psychology, hosting the world cup, scoring goals, or emerging as winning champions are striking occurrences expected to significantly impact the market and influence investors around the globe.
2006, 2010, 2014, and 2018 world cup events were hosted by Germany, South Africa, Brazil, and Russia, respectively. Based on market analysis, in the 20 days before the announcement of the world cup hosts, Germany‘s and South Africa’s major markets experienced a decline in Cumulative Average Abnormal Return (CAAR). In contrast, South African markets experienced a positive upward trend in the 20 days post-announcement, while Germany experienced a gain in over five days post-announcement.
Market analysis of positive changes in trends following host announcements indicates that investors treat this as good news. Following the announcement that Qatar will be hosting the 2022 world cup, its share prices rose to the highest it experienced in 2 years. The Qatar Exchange Index was reported to have increased over 7% at market opening, then closed at about 4% up.

The World Cup and its market-inclined trend
Experts argue that the major influence of world cup activities on the market is strongly tied to sentiments. The most striking observation about these market trends is that theyre as short-lived as the emotions behind them. Through the years, some of the commonly seen market trends include:
1. The trading holiday sequence
Research shows that trading volumes fall during matches, noticeable with trading activity in the host country when the team plays during trading hours. Traders tend to pay less attention to the market and respond poorly to relevant news when a game is ongoing.

A statistical illustration of trade volume during world cup events
During the 2010 world cup, an analysis of trading activity from markets of 15 countries by European Central Bank Scholars revealed a 45% drop in the number of trades and a 55% fall in trading volume, which dipped even further when a goal was scored. In Brazil, a 75% drop was recorded when the national team played, and in Chile, lets say trading was placed on a soft pause.
2. The champions take 75% of the market back home
According to a Goldman Sachs report, the winners experience a short-lived boost in the market over the next few months. This has stayed the same with every world cup except for Brazils win in 2002, where the market remained a home of woes.
Most experts link this phenomenon to traders sentiments, as a win is expected to increase trading volume and the demand. Most winning countries experience positive upward trends for a few months, which eventually fall back significantly quickly. Investors may want to take advantage of these possibilities.

A flow chart on market activities in the champions internal market
3. Runner-ups lose the market to a large extent
In the same way, the champions experience a boom in the global market. Losing countries are expected to experience equally short-lived downward plunges in the markets. According to Goldman‘s report, the last nine countries from the finals underperform in the market by 5.65 in the following months. This effect is short-lived and is attributed firmly to investors’ moods, especially in passionate countires.

Goldmans report on the market performance of world cup winners and runner-ups.


HIJA MARKETS, a Saint Lucia-based brokerage entity, is dealing with multiple trading complaints from users worldwide. Among the complaints, what captured our imagination was the $3,000 fee demand for the unfreezing of profits on the broker’s platform. Such a payment demand immediately raises legitimacy concerns regarding the brokerage firm. Complaints do not stop here; in fact, they suggest a pattern of disappearing funds and endless withdrawal denials. Many traders have accused the broker of carrying out illicit trading activities online. In this HIJA MARKETS review 2026, we have examined every user allegation against the brokerage firm. To give you more means to assess its legitimacy, we have given a thorough look into its regulatory framework.

EMAR Markets, a South Africa-based forex broker, allegedly never misses the opportunity to disappoint its traders, according to their reviews. The user allegations present a disturbing picture, with users repeatedly complaining about pending EMAR MARKETS withdrawal processing in the pretext of a data review process that reportedly seems to have no end. They even accused the broker of withholding funds even after they paid the verification fee worth 2,000 to 5,000 yuan as requested. Some users complained about the not-so-meaningful updates and complete communication halt that further made the overall trading scenario precarious. In this EMAR MARKETS review, we have examined serious user allegations to provide an overview of the overall situation. To further help you assess its legitimacy, we have provided a regulatory framework of this company.

Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.