Abstract:EUROPEAN EQUITIES HEAD FOR THE FOURTH CONSECUTIVE NEGATIVE DAY AHEAD OF THE US OPENING BELL; INVESTORS SHIFT INTO WAIT-AND-SEE MODE AHEAD OF THE NEXT CRUCIAL WEEK; THE BOC RAISED INTEREST RATE AS EXPECTED.

EUROPEAN EQUITIES HEAD FOR THE FOURTH CONSECUTIVE NEGATIVE DAY AHEAD OF THE US OPENING BELL; INVESTORS SHIFT INTO WAIT-AND-SEE MODE AHEAD OF THE NEXT CRUCIAL WEEK; THE BOC RAISED INTEREST RATE AS EXPECTED.
The opening bell is rung on the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) to signify the start of the day's trading session.
Major European equities are heading for a negative close for the fourth consecutive day, pending the US opening, which as always, could be a game changer. Currently, the Dax is down 0.27%, the Cac40 0.10% and the Eurostoxx 0.19%.
However, investors remain in wait-and-see mode ahead of next week, which is relatively straightforward and evident by looking at the market movements, which were mostly small this week. The focus is shifting to the key monetary policy meetings of the Fed, BOE and ECB scheduled for the 14th and 15th of December. These meetings, followed by the US inflation figure to be released on Tuesday, the 13th, will bring much volatility to all the major markets. From the monetary policy decisions, we may get an even more precise idea of what monetary policy attitudes will be for the coming year.
Meanwhile, the latest central bank to raise interest rates was the BOC yesterday, which raised the rate to 4%, up 50bp and to levels not seen since the great financial crisis. There was little reaction to the USDCAD exchange rate, which closed at virtual parity yesterday.
Regarding the macroeconomic calendar, today, investors will mainly focus on initial jobless claims in the US and ECB President Lagardes scheduled speech.
EURUSD, M15

The EURUSD trades near the most interesting intraday resistance area, between the D-1 POC and the 1.0536 mark (yearly HVN). In contrast, the current weekly POC is the most significant intraday support area. From a technical standpoint, an upward breakout of the resistance could lead prices toward the upper part of the medium-term resistance (the one between the two blue lines on the chart). On the flip side, if prices fail to break the resistance, a drop toward the support and to the W-1 VAH becomes the most likely scenario.
Main intraday support areas where to look for long trades in case of a bullish candlestick pattern or short trades in case of a bearish candlestick pattern: 1.05, 1.0483, 1.0429.
Main intraday resistances areas where to look for short trades in case of a bearish candlestick pattern or long trades in case of a bullish candlestick pattern: 1.0524-1.0536, 1.0587.
S&P500, M30

The S&P500 found buyers around the current weekly POC this morning. The area between the W-1 VAL and the current weekly POC represents the most significant intraday support area. From a technical point of view, as long as prices remain above the support, the most likely scenario is a continuation of the rise toward higher resistances (W-1 POC, W-3 POC). On the other hand, a downward breakout of the support could lead prices toward the LVN around the 3890 (another weaker support is around the 3912 mark).
Main intraday support areas where to look for long trades in case of a bullish candlestick pattern or short trades in case of a bearish candlestick pattern: 3934-3938, 3912, 3890.
Main intraday resistances areas where to look for short trades in case of a bearish candlestick pattern or long trades in case of a bullish candlestick pattern: 3956, 3968.
Check below some acronyms of the key words:
POC= Point of Control
VAH= Value Area High
VAL= Value Area Low
LVN= Low Volume Node
HVN= High Volume Node
W-1= last week
W-2= two weeks ago
W-3= three weeks ago
D-1= yesterday
D-2= two days ago
D-3= three days ago


EMAR Markets, a South Africa-based forex broker, allegedly never misses the opportunity to disappoint its traders, according to their reviews. The user allegations present a disturbing picture, with users repeatedly complaining about pending EMAR MARKETS withdrawal processing in the pretext of a data review process that reportedly seems to have no end. They even accused the broker of withholding funds even after they paid the verification fee worth 2,000 to 5,000 yuan as requested. Some users complained about the not-so-meaningful updates and complete communication halt that further made the overall trading scenario precarious. In this EMAR MARKETS review, we have examined serious user allegations to provide an overview of the overall situation. To further help you assess its legitimacy, we have provided a regulatory framework of this company.

Crib Markets, a Mauritius-based multi-asset brokerage entity, has been accused of profit deletions by users worldwide, including those from India. After studying the Crib Markets complaints, it was observed that problems started happening when users looked to withdraw funds from the platform. Multiple users claimed deliberate profit deletions by the brokerage firm upon a withdrawal request. In this Crib Markets review, we have found many such complaints in 2026. Besides sharing complaints, we have provided a thorough look into the broker’s regulatory framework.

IUX, despite having an operational presence for approximately a decade, continues to face allegations from users regarding its several trading aspects. These include complaints on withdrawal processing, deposit failure, and even wide slippages that eat into users’ margins. For some, withdrawals were never executed, for others, withdrawal processing remained only on paper. On the other hand, some’s deposits fail to show on the IUX login even after 45 days of the transaction initiation date. Concerned by these seemingly suspicious trading incidents, users hit out on several review platforms such as WikiFX. This IUX review examines these user allegations while providing a regulatory framework the broker adheres to.

A brokerage operation history of over six years without any clarity of the accounts offered. This stunning fact allegedly applies to ForexDana. While this has been a major concern on the transparency front, user experiences concerning suspicious deposit failures and trade manipulation have not been good for the broker’s reputation either. In this ForexDana review, we have attempted to find the reason behind the growing user frustration, not only through their complaints but also what possibly could have led to these complaints. Yes, you heard it right! We are going to probe the ForexDana regulation status. This will help you make the right financial decision.