Abstract:Choosing a forex broker that is newly established always possesses a certain level of the underlying risk. There are so many uncertainties and unknown information about such a new broker. To make things worse, if this specific broker is operating without any regulatory status or license, this broker is a scammer in disguise.

Established in 2021, NSBroker is a forex broker that is hardly a 1-year-old company registered in Malta. Upon checking on WikiFXs database, it was found that NSBroker has many clones with different registered domains. All of them have low WikiFX scores and do not have any regulatory status or valid licenses to support their business operation. In short, WikiFX does not recommend this broker.
This is similar to the case of Wintersnow Ltd that was highlighted recently.

Read here for more information: https://www.wikifx.com/en/newsdetail/202208168284579306.html
In conjunction with NSBroker, WikiFX received an Exposure piece from our user, named Hesta from South Africa, who was unfairly treated by NSBroker.


Hesta was initially approached by a representative of NSBroker on Whatsapp who promised a guaranteed return on her investment. She was convinced and she made the initial deposit.


Her capital grew as she managed to obtain profits.

However, when she wanted to make a withdrawal, she was told to pay several fees, such as income tax payments, brokerage fees, transfer fees, remittance fees, and more.

That was when she realised that she could have been scammed by NSBroker.
NSBroker later changed its name to Fenda Trade.

WikiFX tried to log on the NSBroker website that was provided by Hesta, but it could not be reached.


On the other hand, Fenda Trade looks like a professionally curated website that is here to substitute the old NSBroker.

It could be that the syndicate behind this group has moved on to another “shell” like a hermit crab to continue targeting new victims. Therefore, WikiFX advises our users to stay clear from both NSBroker and Fenda Trade.


FINEX review 2026 for readers comparing an Indonesia forex broker: understand what Bappebti's A+++ rating does and does not show, then check floating spreads, withdrawals, segregated accounts and the complaint route for PT Finex Bisnis Solusi Futures.

Choosing a tier 1 liquidity forex is not a search for the lowest displayed spread or the longest provider list. It is a broker decision about pricing integrity, depth, routing, credit, reporting, incident response, and client communication. This 2026 guide explains how an institutional liquidity provider, bank liquidity forex, or interbank liquidity provider arrangement fits into a broker’s execution chain; what to test before onboarding; why a “best tier 1 liquidity forex” claim cannot replace due diligence; and how to compare cost beyond commission. Use the execution-quality scorecard, provider questions, routing scenarios, and 90-day onboarding plan to assess whether a liquidity relationship can support your actual client mix, instruments, risk model, and jurisdiction. The goal is not to make a universal ranking. It is to build evidence that your broker can explain, supervise, reconcile, and recover its execution service when market conditions are difficult.

MIFX review 2026: understand published commissions and spreads, the withdrawal process, Instant Withdrawal conditions, and the PT Monex Investindo Futures complaint route without turning community discussion into factual allegations.

Choosing a forex liquidity provider is not a search for the lowest displayed spread or the longest provider list. It is a broker decision about pricing integrity, depth, routing, credit, reporting, incident response, and client communication. This 2026 guide explains how a forex LP, FX liquidity provider, or liquidity provider forex arrangement fits into a broker’s execution chain; what to test before onboarding; why a “best forex liquidity provider” claim cannot replace due diligence; and how to compare cost beyond commission. Use the execution-quality scorecard, provider questions, routing scenarios, and 90-day onboarding plan to assess whether a liquidity relationship can support your actual client mix, instruments, risk model, and jurisdiction. The goal is not to make a universal ranking. It is to build evidence that your broker can explain, supervise, reconcile, and recover its execution service when market conditions are difficult.