Abstract:Singapore’s authorities have come down hard on broker Samtrade FX with all trading services being suspended and three so far unnamed people with links to the firm arrested. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Singapore Police acted after the broker’s name appeared on the Investor Alert List that the regulator operates. The investigation, which started on 28th December, has already taken positive action.
Companies within the Samtrade FX corporate group operate out of Singapore; however, none are actually licensed by MAS. As it is an ‘overseas’ broker, the firms clients will now be trying to unpick the complicated corporate structure to establish what recourse they have. SAM Trade is incorporated in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and is registered under number 25290 IBC 2019 by the Registrar of International Business Companies. The authorities are taking action against Samtrade FX Limited, Samtrade FX LLP and Samtrade FX (SG) Pte Ltd., which have links to Singapore.
With some work needing to be done to get to the bottom of the situation, the bad news for anyone who has been using the platform is that all activities are suspended. This includes withdrawals of funds, and in a statement released on their website on 3rd January, the firm stated:
“We will be taking immediate steps to suspend local and overseas business operations of our key operating entities and other affiliated entities, including but not limited to account opening, account changes, settlements, payments, opening and closing of trades.”
One of the most painful experiences for out-of-pocket traders is when hopes are raised that funds will be returned only to find that doesn‘t happen. Statements from the firm indicate remaining key staff are cooperating with the authorities. This is a relatively positive point as it appears they haven’t left the country with suitcases full of cash.
In a further statement on their website, the broker says:
“We and our officers will co-operate fully and render all assistance to the Authorities in their investigations.”
A decision has also been made to bring in “Mr Goh Thien Phong from GTP Advisory PAC and Mr Chan Kheng Tek from PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services Pte Ltd” who will jointly work as interim judicial managers (IJMs) to “independently and professionally oversee all matters and affairs relating to these entities.”

Foreign exchange trading is basically of two types: Direct Market Access (DMA) and Over the Counter (OTC). Both come with their own pros and cons. It’s important to understand these two concepts before figuring out the differences between them. In this article, we will explain all of these.

IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.

Orbex, a Cyprus-based brokerage entity, has recorded 30 exposure complaints on WikiFX, a leading forex broker regulation inquiry tool, so far. Other review websites have also recorded a healthy number of complaints against the brokerage firm. These complaints largely talk about the alleged profit confiscations by the broker in the name of trading violations, difficulty in accessing fund withdrawals, capital losses due to artificial slippage, etc. In this Orbex review, we have investigated user complaints and provided a regulatory overview of the broker.

FCA warns Swift TradeX in a notice first published and updated on 1 September 2026. The UK Financial Conduct Authority says the firm may be providing or promoting financial services without permission, is not authorised, and may be targeting people in the UK. The notice names the website swifttradexai.com, a Worcester address and a UK telephone number, but also cautions that unauthorised businesses may use incorrect or borrowed contact details. The confirmed issue is authorisation status—not a court finding about every transaction. Anyone considering a payment should stop, verify the firm independently, and avoid using contact information supplied by the platform itself.