Abstract:The US Government is trying to intervene in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) case against Eddy Alexandre and his company, EminiFX, Inc. This becomes clear from a set of documents filed by the Government in the New York Southern District Court on July 25, 2022.
The US Government is trying to intervene in the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) case against Eddy Alexandre and his company, EminiFX, Inc. This becomes clear from a set of documents filed by the Government in the New York Southern District Court on July 25, 2022.
The United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York has signed a memorandum in support of a motion (i) to intervene in the CFTC case, pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and (ii) to stay discovery in this matter in its entirety until the completion of the trial or other disposition in the parallel criminal case, with the understanding that the receiver appointed by the Court will continue his oversight and administrative functions (such as securing assets and records, establishing a claims process for victims, and providing updates to the Court).
The Receiver and the CFTC do not oppose the Governments motions. Defendant Eddy Alexandre opposes the motion for a complete stay of discovery, but consents to the motion to intervene.
The Criminal Case arises from the same set of facts and circumstances that underlie the Civil Case. According to the Government, a full stay of discovery is appropriate because any exchange of discovery would be asymmetrical and would allow the overlapping defendant in the Criminal Case and Civil Case, Eddy Alexandre, to circumvent the criminal discovery rules and improperly tailor his defense in the Criminal Case.
In similar situations, courts in this Circuit and others have entered a complete stay of civil enforcement proceedings when there is a parallel criminal prosecution with overlapping defendants and facts, including over a defendants objection.
In May 2022, the CFTC filed a complaint against Alexandre and EminiFX alleging that Alexandre was operating EminiFX as a fraudulent enterprise and misappropriating EminiFX investor funds. On May 11, the CFTC moved for the Court to issue a statutory restraining order, inter alia, freezing the assets of EminiFX and Alexandre, and appointing the Receiver to take control of EminiFX, relief which this Court granted the same day.
On May 12, 2022, a criminal complaint against Alexandre was unsealed, and Alexandre was arrested and presented that same day. The Criminal Complaint charged Alexandre with one count of commodities fraud, in violation of Title 7, United States Code, Sections 9(1) and 13(a)(5), Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 180.1, and Title 18, United States Code, Section 2, and one count of wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2.

ST Global Markets presents itself as a forex and CFD broker with over 1000 trading instruments for investors. Despite impressive trading advertisements, the Bahamas-based brokerage firm continues to receive negative feedback from traders. They have questioned the company’s withdrawal processing as well as slow responses from its customer support team. In this ST Global Markets review article, we have examined several such user allegations against the forex broker.

Is your Dollars Markets trading account disabled by the broker without any reason? Did the broker allegedly wipe out profits made on the trading platform? Did the broker even seize your principal investment? Did you fail to receive your funds into your bank account even after successful Dollars Markets withdrawal application approval? These user allegations have become increasingly intense on broker review platforms, such as WikiFX, a renowned forex broker regulation inquiry tool. We have examined these allegations in this Dollars Markets review article. Additionally, the article sheds light on the regulatory oversight for the brokerage firm.

octa, a Cyprus-based forex enterprise, has been troubled by a spate of negative user comments concerning withdrawals and slippage. While examining octa withdrawal cases, we found some user complaints talking about legitimate profit removal even after an extensive review by the broker for a long time. Such cases can understandably frustrate traders who apply several effective strategies to earn profits in a fast-moving trading landscape. In this octa review article, we have examined a host of user allegations against the brokerage firm as of 2026.

OANDA Japan will shut down MT4 and MT5 web terminal access at the end of May, while desktop and mobile trading remain available as the broker continues its MT4 phase-out.