Abstract:The Securities Commission (SC) stands as the financial regulator of Malaysia, and gave out a statement today. This statement is in regard that Alpari Trading Malaysia, as well as Alpari International, do not have authorizations to operate within the country. As such, the SC has put the global FX broker on its caution list of unlicensed companies.

The Securities Commission (SC) stands as the financial regulator of Malaysia, and gave out a statement today. This statement is in regard that Alpari Trading Malaysia, as well as Alpari International, do not have authorizations to operate within the country. As such, the SC has put the global FX broker on its caution list of unlicensed companies.
Throughout the past two years, Alpari, a retail forex broker, has closed its business in various countries for various reasons. Back in 2019, the central bank of Russia opted to strip the regulatory licenses off of several local retail FX exchanges. Ever since, the Russian arm of Alpari has ceased all activity.
Back in 2018, Alpari had closed down its Belize subsidiary voluntarily, and moved its clients to its Grenadines and Saint Vincent subsidiaries.
The SC has also opted to blacklist BitForex, a cryptocurrency exchange, doing so alongside ten websites. This is for operating various investment services, even though these entities do not hold any sort of legal authorization to do business within Malaysia at large. BitForex stands as being incorporated in Seychelles, and is based out of Hong Kong.
Due to their natures, the SC is advising the citizens of Malaysia not to use the services these individuals or companies provide, nor should they make an investment within it. The simple fact is that these entities are neither approved nor licensed by the Securities Commission, and these groups have opted to not seek regulatory approval before doing business in a country they know well they shouldnt be allowed to.
As for the exact details, 11 new names of persons and entities were added to the blacklist. These names are: Alpari International/Alpari Trading Malaysia, BitForex, ICGXE, Azzad Islamic Investment, Ikhlas Exclusive, Rise-Market/Rise Marketing & Consultant Sdn Bhd, World Trade Center Investment/World Trade Center (M) Sdn Bhd, Triumph International/Triumph Investment Malaysia, Gold Hijab Investment Group, Al-Esbah General Trading Co, as well as Royal Win Trade.
Back in July, the SC had issued out similar warnings against big names like eToro and Binance, as well as FintechFX and OctaFX. The regulator stated that these platforms dont have the authorization to operate within their countries, and are subsequently not subject to the regulatory oversight of the SC.
Should any individual take part in regulated activities without valid registration or licensing from the SC, that individual is breaking the Capital Markets and Services Act of 2007. Should one of these individuals be convicted, they will face fines and a prison sentence of up to ten years.

Did you have a good trading experience with LONG ASIA initially before it went bad, as you sought fund withdrawals from the platform? Did Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex brokerage house deny you access to funds despite numerous withdrawal requests? Have you lost your funds because of this denial? Failing to log in despite numerous attempts? You are not alone! Many traders have accused the broker of these trading practices. In this LONG ASIA review article, we have highlighted some complaints against the broker. Read on as we share all these details with you.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has filed a formal complaint against Spartan Capital Securities LLC, its CEO John Dennis Lowry, and its former Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) Kim Marie Monchik. The Department of Enforcement alleges a sophisticated scheme to defraud customers during a pharmaceutical company’s initial public offering (IPO), resulting in over $50 million in profits for the firm and its insiders while customers were left with dramatic losses.

When traders ask, "Is ACY Securities regulated?" The answer is much more complicated than a simple ‘YES’ or ‘NO’. While the broker does have licenses from well-known regulatory agencies, this fact alone doesn't tell the whole story, which is quite concerning. Our research shows a big gap between the broker's legal compliance in one area and a worrying pattern of international regulatory warnings and serious user complaints. This article is not a sales pitch; it is a careful look at the facts. Read on!

When choosing a broker, the main question is always about trust. Is ACY SECURITIES legit, or is it a platform you should avoid? This question is especially tricky for ACY, a broker that shows two different sides to the trading world. On one hand, it works with official licenses from well-known regulatory bodies, including Australia's strict ASIC. This suggests it follows rules and provides security. However, a different story comes from traders worldwide. The broker has received many serious complaints from users and has been given warnings by financial authorities in several countries. This creates a big difference that can be confusing and worrying for potential investors. Our investigation aims to go beyond a simple YES or NO answer. We will examine the available information, from regulatory filings to real user experiences, to build a fact-based picture. WikiFX, a global broker inquiry app, gives ACY SECURITIES a score of 7.44 out of 10, but immediately adds an important note: the