Abstract:On July 23–24, renowned economist Fu Peng will attend WikiEXPO Hong Kong in Hong Kong, joining global industry leaders, regulatory representatives, and fintech experts to discuss the evolving challenges of trading safety amid macroeconomic transformation. Against the backdrop of accelerating restructuring in global financial markets, the trading environment is facing unprecedented uncertainty. To explore this critical theme, WikiEXPO conducted an exclusive interview with Mr. Fu Peng. This interview series will be released in multiple episodes, each focusing on a key question and presenting his in-depth insights into the global trading risk landscape. Following the first episode, which examined macro structural shifts, this third episode turns to one of the most pressing topics for investors today:About asset allocation in an uncertain world, how should investors interpret the concept of “hard currency”? And which asset classes offer greater transparency and more controllable risks?

On July 23–24, renowned economist Fu Peng will attend WikiEXPO Hong Kong in Hong Kong, joining global industry leaders, regulatory representatives, and fintech experts to discuss the evolving challenges of trading safety amid macroeconomic transformation.
Against the backdrop of accelerating restructuring in global financial markets, the trading environment is facing unprecedented uncertainty. To explore this critical theme, WikiEXPO conducted an exclusive interview with Mr. Fu Peng. This interview series will be released in multiple episodes, each focusing on a key question and presenting his in-depth insights into the global trading risk landscape.
Following the first episode, which examined macro structural shifts, this third episode turns to one of the most pressing topics for investors today:About asset allocation in an uncertain world,How should investors interpret the concept of “hard currency”? And which asset classes offer greater transparency and more controllable risks?
When asked which asset—gold, Bitcoin, commodities, or forex—is most likely to become a “hard currency” in the coming years, Fu Peng offered a clear perspective:
No asset class can inherently serve as a long-term “hard currency.”
In his view, all assets are essentially vehicles whose prices fluctuate around underlying macroeconomic logic. Their performance is determined by economic cycles and institutional environments, rather than by labels.
Take gold as an example. During periods of global order reshaping or systemic transformation, governments often absorb and redistribute large-scale debt, reinforcing golds safe-haven appeal and pushing prices higher. However, when productivity and economic structures stabilize, gold may also experience prolonged periods of stagnation.
This highlights a key principle:
The essence of investing is not identifying a “safe” asset, but understanding its underlying drivers and cyclical position.
When comparing investment environments, Fu Peng noted that from a product perspective, traditional financial markets hold structural advantages.
Markets represented by FICC (fixed income, currencies, and commodities) benefit from long development histories and well-established regulatory frameworks:
As a result, these assets generally offer higher transparency and relatively more controllable risks.
However, he emphasized that “controllable” does not mean “risk-free.” Once complex derivatives or excessive leverage are introduced, risks can escalate rapidly—regardless of the asset class.
Regarding crypto assets, Fu Peng pointed out a structural transition in progress.
In their early stages, crypto markets were characterized by:
Today, as mainstream markets gradually bring crypto assets under regulatory oversight—and as institutional capital begins to participate—the landscape is evolving:
As a leading global fintech and trading industry event, WikiEXPO is committed to bringing together industry insights, fostering open dialogue, and driving the continuous evolution of the financial ecosystem.
At the upcoming WikiEXPO Hong Kong, Fu Peng will share further in-depth perspectives. We look forward to connecting with global participants in person to explore a more resilient, efficient, and transparent future for fintech.
July 23–24 · Hong Kong
Engage with Fu Peng live.
In an age of uncertainty, seek answers grounded in clarity.
WikiEXPO Hong Kong — we look forward to welcoming you.
Download the new WikiFX app for updated broker rankings and regulatory statuses by scanning this QR code.


Do you constantly witness withdrawal denials by VEBSON, a Saint Lucia-based forex broker? Have you witnessed withdrawal denial only when you earn profits? Does the brokerage firm constantly push you into losses by manipulating your trades? Did you fail to receive payouts despite passing the challenge? These alleged issues have made their way to broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this VEBSON review article, we have examined several such allegations against the trading firm. Take a look!

Have you invested or are you willing to invest in Land Prime, a UK-based brokerage firm? You need to read this article, where we not only share the list of its brokerage products but also enlist both positive and negative feedback for the broker. It’s like a comprehensive Land Prime review, giving you an unbiased take of the broker so that you can make an informed decision whether to invest in it or not. Let’s begin examining the brokerage firm.

Credex Auto Title Loans emerges as a recommended lending solution with a solid 7.5 out of 10 overall rating, backed by an impressive 182 customer reviews that paint a largely positive picture of their services. The company demonstrates exceptional performance in customer satisfaction, with a remarkably low 5.5% negative rate and an overwhelming 161 positive reviews out of the total feedback received. Read more.

Capital Collaboration emerges as a recommended forex broker with a solid 7.8 out of 10 overall rating, demonstrating consistent performance that appeals to traders seeking reliability in the competitive forex market. Based on a comprehensive analysis of 150 reviews, the broker maintains an impressive 1.3% negative rate, with an overwhelming 143 positive reviews reflecting strong trader satisfaction. For more information, read this extensive analysis.