Home -
Original -
Main body -

WikiFX Express

TMGM
Exness
GTCFX
SBCFX
XM
EC markets
FXTM
AvaTrade
FOREX.com
IC

1,789 Victims, Nearly $300 Million Lost: Gold High-Return Scam Exposed

WikiFX
| 2026-02-26 13:58

Abstract:China’s Supreme People’s Court disclosed a major cross-border investment scam in which fraudsters used fake gold trading and fabricated profits to deceive victims, resulting in losses exceeding 280 million yuan. The case highlights the growing sophistication of online investment fraud and reinforces the need for investor vigilance and proper due diligence.

WhatsApp Image 2026-02-26 at 1.56.55 PM.jpeg

On February 26, China‘s Supreme People’s Court held a press conference to announce a series of representative cases highlighting the judiciarys ongoing efforts to combat telecommunications and online fraud. Among the cases disclosed was a major cross-border scam involving 14 defendants led by an individual surnamed Yu. The case revolved around a scheme that combined stock recommendation tactics with fraudulent investment operations, ultimately causing enormous financial losses to victims.

image.png

According to information presented at the briefing, the criminal group targeted mainland Chinese residents by promoting what appeared to be legitimate investment opportunities. Gold trading, particularly so-called “high-return” investments, was used as the central lure. Exploiting investors natural desire for profit, members of the syndicate carefully constructed a façade of credibility. They posed as experienced investors, created the image of celebrity mentors, and fabricated records of successful trades to convince victims that substantial gains were within easy reach.

Investigators revealed that Yu and his associates operated through a platform known as “Chuanglifeng Gold Industry,” which falsely claimed to offer access to gold trading services, including “London gold” transactions. The group established its operational base overseas, where dedicated scam centres were set up to coordinate activities. Working in a structured and coordinated manner, syndicate members added large numbers of potential victims through social networking platforms. After initial contact, victims were gradually guided into private chat groups and livestream sessions designed to reinforce the illusion of professional investment guidance.

Within these groups, fraudsters shared manipulated screenshots of profits and repeatedly promoted narratives suggesting that following the advice of designated “teachers” or “analysts” would generate reliable returns. Victims were persuaded to deposit funds into the platform, believing they were participating in genuine gold trades. In reality, no legitimate trading took place. Funds transferred by victims were channelled through third-party payment systems and moved across multiple accounts before being consolidated into accounts controlled by the fraudulent platform. The proceeds were then distributed among members of the operation according to pre-arranged profit-sharing agreements.

Authorities stated that over a period of approximately one year, the scheme resulted in losses affecting 1,789 victims, with total damages exceeding 280 million yuan. The scale of the case underscores the growing sophistication of modern investment scams, particularly those leveraging digital platforms and cross-border structures to obscure the movement of funds and evade detection.

For observers in Malaysia and across the region, the case reflects patterns that are increasingly familiar. Fraud schemes frequently rely on social media outreach, carefully scripted communication, and the promise of unusually high returns to attract investors. The use of professional-looking platforms and fabricated profit data continues to blur the line between legitimate investment services and criminal operations, making vigilance more important than ever.

Financial regulators and enforcement agencies consistently remind investors that genuine trading platforms do not guarantee profits, nor do they rely on informal messaging channels to solicit deposits. As digital finance becomes more accessible, the responsibility for verification and due diligence remains firmly with individual investors. Cases such as this serve as a stark reminder that the appearance of legitimacy can be meticulously engineered, while the financial consequences for victims can be devastating and irreversible.

20260126-101313.png
Scam AlertInvestment ScamTAGS scam investment scamsGold

Read more

Warren Bowie & Smith Review 2026: 1.23 Score Raises Red Flags as Withdrawal Complaints Grow

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Original 2026-08-19 22:41

Angel One Review 2026: Customer Complaints, Trading Issues and What Investors Should Know

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

Original 2026-08-18 21:24

AuroraEx Review 2026: Reputation Hit by Fund Scam & Ponzi Scheme Allegations

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.

Original 2026-08-17 19:51

PURPLE TRADING Review: Do Withdrawal Delays, Wide Spreads & Customer-Service Complaints Hold Weight?

PURPLE TRADING, a Seychelles-based forex brokerage entity, is constantly criticized by numerous traders on review platforms such as WikiFX. While withdrawal delays or denials are reportedly a common issue here, there are also complaints about wide spreads and poor customer services. This PURPLE TRADING review examines user-reported allegations against the trading enterprise. Additionally, the article takes a close look at the broker’s regulatory status.

Original 2026-08-12 21:19

WikiFX Express

TMGM
Exness
GTCFX
SBCFX
XM
EC markets
FXTM
AvaTrade
FOREX.com
IC

WikiFX Broker

FXTM

FXTM

Regulated
XM

XM

Regulated
FXCM

FXCM

Regulated
DBG MARKETS

DBG MARKETS

Regulated
AvaTrade

AvaTrade

Regulated
GTCFX

GTCFX

Regulated
FXTM

FXTM

Regulated
XM

XM

Regulated
FXCM

FXCM

Regulated
DBG MARKETS

DBG MARKETS

Regulated
AvaTrade

AvaTrade

Regulated
GTCFX

GTCFX

Regulated

WikiFX Broker

FXTM

FXTM

Regulated
XM

XM

Regulated
FXCM

FXCM

Regulated
DBG MARKETS

DBG MARKETS

Regulated
AvaTrade

AvaTrade

Regulated
GTCFX

GTCFX

Regulated
FXTM

FXTM

Regulated
XM

XM

Regulated
FXCM

FXCM

Regulated
DBG MARKETS

DBG MARKETS

Regulated
AvaTrade

AvaTrade

Regulated
GTCFX

GTCFX

Regulated

Latest News

Interactive Brokers Changes Overnight Order Default in TWS

WikiFX
2026-08-18 13:30

LQH Markets Review: Unregulated Broker With Growing Withdrawal Complaints

WikiFX
2026-08-18 16:00

ASIC Pulled 19,400 Scams as AI Deepfakes Target Investors

WikiFX
2026-08-18 16:00

WHITEFOREX Review: Is Your Deposit Safe?

WikiFX
2026-08-18 18:00

Trendo Review: Is Your Deposit Safe?

WikiFX
2026-08-18 18:00

Interactive Brokers changes overnight order default in TWS

WikiFX
2026-08-18 16:00

Ghana cedi jumps 6.9% against dollar in one week

WikiFX
2026-08-18 18:00

Exclusive Capital Review: Regulated by CySEC, but Traders Report Withdrawal Problems

WikiFX
2026-08-18 16:00

U.S. Rates and Tariffs Shape Macro Risk Sentiment

WikiFX
2026-08-18 15:00

Vonway Review: Withdrawal Complaints and a Regulator Warning

WikiFX
2026-08-18 16:00

Rate Calc

USD
CNY
Current Rate: 0

Amount

USD

Available

CNY
Calculate

You may also like

Vakto

Vakto

Crypto Bullhorn invest & Earn

Crypto Bullhorn invest & Earn

Deluxe Digital Market

Deluxe Digital Market

 ApexTradeAI

ApexTradeAI

TrendX

TrendX

VERTEX DIGITAL LIMITED

VERTEX DIGITAL LIMITED

CrestPoint Capital

CrestPoint Capital

MetaSmartt

MetaSmartt

 TradMint

TradMint

Easy Trade Markets

Easy Trade Markets