Abstract:Two UK traders fined £280K in FCA insider trading case, highlighting tougher market abuse regulation and surveillance compliance demands.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has secured fines totalling £280,000 and suspended prison sentences against two self-employed day traders for insider dealing, in a case underscoring the regulators uncompromising stance on market integrity enforcement.
Matthew and Nikolas West, acting outside any regulated firm, were found guilty of exploiting confidential broker information between 2016 and 2020. The FCA confirmed that the misconduct breached UK Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) and demonstrated that no participant in the capital markets is beyond regulatory scrutiny in trading.
Matthew West, a veteran trader with over two decades of experience, was approached under legitimate “wall crossing” arrangements to consider investments in upcoming capital raises—often involving Alternative Investment Market-listed companies. These arrangements required strict confidentiality.
Instead, Matthew passed the price-sensitive details to his brother Nikolas. The pair coordinated trades ahead of public announcements, generating over £44,000 in gains. However, under UK trading regulations, penalties were calculated on the total value of all trades executed with inside information, not just profits.
The court ordered:
Both must also contribute over £50,000 towards prosecution costs and pay the confiscation order within 14 days or face further custodial sentences.
The FCA stressed that this was not institutional misconduct but an opportunistic case of capital markets misconduct. The regulator warned that surveillance systems for compliance must adapt to detect suspicious trading activity monitoring across all communication channels, including encrypted messaging and voice notes.
Firms are expected to:
Under Financial Conduct Authority insider dealing rules and Market abuse regulation UK, firms must maintain insider lists, control access to sensitive data, and ensure timely public disclosures. FCA Handbook SYSC 10A mandates recording and monitoring of relevant communications, while Market Watch 79 highlights recurring failings in alert calibration and off-channel communication oversight.
The FCA‘s enforcement actions in this and other insider dealing cases reaffirm that market integrity enforcement is not just about having policies—it’s about ensuring they work in practice.
Multibank Group faces mounting withdrawal complaints, regulatory scrutiny, and scam warnings from traders worldwide. Learn the facts before investing.
Winning the forex trading challenge but failing to receive bonuses as promised by Trendo? Have you faced losses due to the manipulative trade practices employed by the broker? Do your withdrawal requests remain pending for months? It may be time to pull your funds from Trendo, even if that means taking legal action. Given the numerous trader complaints recently, it only makes sense to leave this trader. In this article, we have shared their complaints. Read on!
Bulenox is currently operating in the forex market, but before you invest or even engage with it, there are some things you need to know. Whether you stumbled upon it yourself or were contacted directly, understanding the facts is crucial to protect your hard-earned money. Our in-depth investigation uncovered several red flags that every trader should be aware of. Read on and stay informed.
Do you fail to encash the profitable trade executed through GMZ Global? Have you been tricked into depositing a hefty volume in your GMZ Global forex trading account? Are you annoyed over the lack of support from its customer service team? These indicate a potential forex investment scam. Keep reading to know more.